Following our debate https://missionvictoryindia.com/should-cos-be-leading-from-the-front/ published following the unfortunate deaths of five 21 Rashtriya Rifles (21 RR) personnel, including the Commanding officer (CO) Col Ashutosh Sharma, in a joint operation with the Jammu and Kashmir Police (JKP) on 2 May, 2020, more respondents; COs who have served in Counter Insurgency environs have sent in their responses, prompting a second part to an already all encompassing debate. Responses are as follows:
Col. Pradeep Dalvi
Firstly, let me start my response with offering my heartfelt condolences to the family of the martyred officer and jawans of 21 RR who laid down their lives in Handwara ops.
Secondly, operations in CI grid especially in J&K are always going to be small team operations led by young officers and JCOs. There have been cases especially in the north east where large operations have been undertaken with coordination at the appropriate level. Since the last few years we have lost COs in small team operations where senior officers have led from the front . That brings in the question “whether COs should lead from the front”.
Thirdly, it takes about two decades to train COs and he is at threshold to hold senior assignments in future. Being an instructor in AWC , Mhow, I remember officers doing SC courses asking me for “ Gurumantra for successful Command”. It gives me an impression that the present generation of officers have evolved their own mantra which I am trying to decipher.
Command of the Bn or RR bn in CI grid /LOC is considered a stepping stone for successful command. That involves gallantry award, nomination to HC and equivalent courses and lastly next rank be it Brig or Maj Gen .
Statistics reflect that the above categories of officers have a better chance of promotion to the next rank compared to their counterparts who command in peace time locations. This mind set amongst the officers, especially Infantry, have led to taking risk at all levels resulting in some of the finest COs getting martyred in the operations which could have been led by JCOs/NCOs.
Having operated along with RR Bn in sector HQ, let me enumerate some issues that are playing on the minds of COs. Firstly he has to operate and produce results in two years of his command. One third of the manpower of the Bn including officers are always being turned over resulting in pressure on officers to produce results in a short time. Coy cdrs with 8-9 yrs of service have inadequate experience and exposure resulting in CO supervising, coordinating and taking undue risk even to the extent of leading from the front.
The point here for consideration is in the event of CO leading from the front “ how far front the CO must be”. Should he be leading the charge with a small team to clear the house or should he be close enough to control and coordinate the entire operations.
I think this question will get resolved if you stick to the basics of tactics taught during JC courses. Here in such a situation I think CO should always place himself close to the inner cordon to direct and coordinate the operations. It does not mean that CO should lead the operation and carry out house to house clearance drill.
If you compare recently conducted operations (Handwara encounter and Riyaz Naikoo encounter at Beighpora) you will notice that Beighpora operations were done with a lot of deliberations and planning resulting elimination of Riyaz naikoo and two other terrorists without casualties to own troops. I am sure the Officer in charge of the operations must have led from the front and located himself close enough to influence the operations.
Lastly and sadly some of our senior officers including some veterans believe in this policy of leading from the front to an extent that officers should lead the charge. All available options are not explored before taking such decisions and case in point is Pampore operations a few years back where fine young officers of SF lost their lives.
Col. Rajinder Kushwaha
I entirely agree with Col Pradeep Dalvi. This is what I had said in my piece. You see the ball game in Counter Insurgency and Counter Terror (CICT) operations is entirely different. In his given area of responsibility in the CI grid. The CO is the backbone of the CI grid. Should he fall victim or get captured by the militants, while leading the operation at sub team level, he would jeopardise the whole CI grid.
The essence of CICT operations is that they were conducted at a lower level in floating localities. We have come a long way from CASO and SADO to mission- oriented and Target based operations in the CI Grid. CO’s job to identify targets and allot to subunits and his sub teams. Large scale operations are a rarity these days. The emphasis is on real time actionable intelligence.
Successful CICT operations demand locating a ‘Needle in the Haystack’ with the help of trustworthy informers —- which are developed by the subunits. They are called “Moles” amongst insurgent organisations. Without them, it is grappling in the dark. Those who have operated in CICT environs,they will understand it.
Those who have only seen the “matches” from the galleries, can not envision this doctrine of CICT operations. By commanding Brigades and Divisions (Call them RR Sectors or RR Force HQs) in CICT operations, one does not become an expert on Counter Insurgency. One has to have first hand knowledge at sub unit level.
Col. Alok Asthana
The question must be answered only in this specific situation, not in thin air. I don’t know the facts first hand. However, most media reports that these 5 people went in all by themselves. The means of communication with the unit was the cell phone of CO. They were all killed, no one knows how. Unit came to know of it some hours later. If these are indeed the facts, then it was a terrible plan.
Whoever made that plan was responsible for these 5 deaths. Those who are ok with such planning, or implementation or even daring, are responsible for several such deaths in future too. What an army we’ve become - very liberal with the lives of our men.
In our desire to hide the weaknesses of the army, we’re portraying a wrong picture. This has been happening since 65 war at least and is the biggest single reason for the army being so bad as an institution despite some very fine officers. Let us stop getting our men killed. A good start can be made by stopping the system of awards.
Firstly, propagating that a CO should not lead from front can have adverse effects on junior leadership. No such advice should be given. The best ways is:-
Secondly, stop giving awards to paper tigers sitting in headquarters. They want decorations by pushing the commanding officers for results.
Thirdly, do not sack a CO/ Junior leader on the first go if a terrorist has got away. Remember a terrorist is well trained and he sees his getaway route first before selecting a hideout.
Lastly, an award should only be recommended after a case study of each operation.